Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26692787-20151030123440/@comment-5275054-20151031195208

There are elements through-out the site that I don't 'like' either but I state my case and go with what the community decides. In this case it was debated once before when the gem icon was initially added and it only came up again because of a unique requirement where the wagon required could also be used obtained via a reward.

In my opinion the should be kept not only for the reasons stated in my previous comment but also because without I feel that they add more confusion than they resolve. Again that is just my opinion. Everyone consumes information a little differently and applies a little different logic to what they see and thus how it should ideally be displayed.

That being said, a quick survey of a few of the different contracts shows that we have not kep the same standard through out in the descriptions. Placement of the icon, before or after; inclusion of 'x' when multiple items are required, 1x vs 1; and a few other little items. We had attempted to establish Mrs. Wilma as the standard but that obviously does not have all the elements present in the season or hard contracts. (And in review them I would skew my vote toward #1 or #9 from Pella's list above, as I think it best conveys the idea).

Yes we need to settle on a standard, yes a style guide would be helpful in establishing a definitive reference. In the mean time I would suggest we build upon Mrs. Wilma which was already accepted as the 'default' layout and tweek the additional elements in accordance with that.

My opinion has been stated and I'll support the consensous.