Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-15636815-20150222200238/@comment-5275054-20150223131243

OUTSTANDING!! Looks great! Much easier to read an follow!

I think the examples are spot on. I would really only include one more with XP: With that I think you will have everything covered and shouold have enough information for anyone to build out their own set of calculations.
 * Example with electric locomotive + one type of cargo wagon + one type of XP wagon (1 day)

The table looks good although highlighting the 10 minute trip is a little confusing. I would suggest moving the note to just after the "10 minutes" similar to the 20 minutes and highlight the 20 minute row since it is the special case that is not present all the time. I also understand the lack of accuracy for the per/min calculations but you may want to consider adding back in some sort of relative per min ratio or effectiviness. Without it what is lost is that the shorter trips have a higher effective yield. I know the table is at the bottom of the page but not sure everyone will scroll all that way. Maybe label the column "Effective per/min rate" so as not to be confused and used in calculations? Just a thought.

For the destinations table, I like it! I am leaning towards the no name idea on the images. The only alternative I could think of would be to shrink the images and place both, one on top of the other, lined up with the names and loco types. Not sure how that would look or if it would be too busy. The other tweak might be to consolidate the icon into a single row - Loco, loco, cargo - instead of a row for each. Again not sure how that would look and if it would be more or less confusing. The last little idea would be to just insert a row for 20 min. with a link to the table below. Just so people hunting for it don't get frustrated by not scrolling all the way down.

Overall a massive improvement to the page. Thanks for all the hard work!