Thread:Katat0nyx/@comment-15636815-20150623131519

Good morning!

Okay, I know I've been gone for a while, so I'm willing to acknowledge that some things were discussed and changed in my absence.

Before I left, Nickembrey was spearheading a project to bring consistency to the way the various contract lists are formatted. Several items discussed and decided by the community were:
 * When one optional objective requires gems, place a gems icon next to it. Items purchased for gold are the norm and require no special attention, so there's no need for a gold icon next to these items.
 * Delete the icon within the entries for that column. The icon is in the column header, and it consumes space unnecessarily. (While space isn't at a premium in these tables, it is in others. Removing the icon sitewide helps provide more consistency.)
 * Cost of buildings and such should use parameter  instead of.
 * Maybe more, but those are the things that scream at me this morning.

That was then, and this is now. Please bring me up to speed on the current standards. ;-) 