Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-15636815-20131111185541/@comment-15636815-20131116081814

Thanks for the suggestions, Katat0nyx! Let's see...

1. I've moved the TOC to the top, and we can all see what we think. I moved it down, and had the text wrap around it, because I thought it looked awkward because it was long and created a long, blank spot on the page. Okay, it's not actually all that long on proposed Themes page, but it's much longer on the proposed Extensions page. Again, feedback from as many people as possible will help us make this as good as we can make it.

2. Done. Kept section, linked column headers to "Discounted Cost" section on same page, removed footnote.

3. Done. Please check wording.

4. Done. Please check image and wording.

5. Done. Please check wording.

6. This one is tricky. The initial feedback on using this format was positive:  "Clean, uncluttered look." Of course, it worked on the page that received that review. It's broken on this page, and I have no idea why. Maybe you can help fix it.

Please take a look at the Metropolis Buildings page. Several items on here use the "rowspan" format that the proposed page uses. All of the "5th Ave" entries work perfectly, along with several others. These items on that page do not work:
 * Baikonur Cosmodrome
 * Buran Launch Pad
 * Michigan Central
 * Chicago Spire

In those cases, the line extends one cell beyond where it should. It does the same thing on the page I built, but it's more noticeable because the "one cell" is the final cell in each row.

The source code is identical on the lines that work and the lines that don't, as far as I can tell. Is it possible that some hidden code snuck in when I copied from Notepad, or something? I did delete and retype a few lines to test that; the problem remained, but who knows?

The only guaranteed way to avoid this problem is to enter "dual cost" items as two separate entries. Would this be more or less confusing, do you think? We can make arguments for both sides.

Another factor is that a huge number of pages on this Wiki use the "rowspan" method of dealing with dual cost items. If we're going for consistency, every one will need to be redone. Then again, once we settle on a format for these two pages, we probably would need to redo all of those pages, anyway, so maybe that's not a big deal.

Feedback from you, Mhommer, and anyone else who wants to contribute is welcome, encouraged, and exactly what we need.