Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-7451135-20131219121156/@comment-15636815-20131223054854

Opinion needed Opinion needed For the last question, I think you're asking if we should use the symbol within tables, such as "". There are many tables around the site that use XP. The symbol doesn't really fit in some of them; we just haven't gotten around to fixing them yet. In my opinion, for sitewide consistency, we should use the symbol only in headers, and just the numbers within the table data. Opinion needed
 * hmmm ... Well, we could put all of Santa's contractor stuff on one page, forever, and all of Santa's story stuff on one page, forever. Those will be some REALLY long pages in just a few years. Someone already suggested splitting the contractor page into separate pages per year, and no one has yet responded. I tend to think it's a good idea, but we definitely need more input.
 * If they're going to different places, I guess that's all right. Are both of those links on the same page?
 * Actually, the construction "Claus's" is correct. Newspapers started the myth of using the s' construction to save print space, which isn't really a concern online. At the same time, I agree that we should keep things consistent with the names of the contractor shop pages. Let's make all contractor shop and contractor story pages follow either the "Santa Shop/Story" format or the "Santa's Shop/Story" format. I don't care which, as long as all are the same.
 * I think the photo's okay.