Thread:BentLauridsenDK/@comment-26692787-20161118174043/@comment-26942307-20161119100009

Just to make sure. Have you ended up with the decisions that we remove the Cost in front of the function?

we have to make sure that is also works in the future in case new contracts are added that starts with the same letter. We have seen that they can create a new contract with the same name (Ethan & Ethan II), what would happen if they ex created a new Cornelius II, that could give reason for problems.

This is why I didn´t suggested this way, because I couldn't find the solution to make this easy and functional in the future, sure it is easy to find a solution here and now that work, but what about later, at that time we might have to use the time to split it again. Because something new that we have no idea of now.