Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26185947-20150319184749/@comment-26185947-20150323095102

Well, at first, it is not photoshopped. Do you know the difference between PNG and SVG? Here is a good example and info about it what it does and how it looks.

The problem with this kind of tiny dotted pixel-based images is, when you enlarge it, like in the infobox, there is not enough information and the system just adds extra pixel to it, which makes it look dizzy and dotted.

I took this PNG image as an underlayer and drew over it, so that this version is a vector-based image, which can be enlarged lossless.

With a tiny model like the PNG-Version it is hard to tell where all the details are and what they look like. here, you have both pix side to side to each other and the difference is obvious, but when it is single standing no one will tell.

I think a clean vector-based image, still or even, looks better than this one when it's enlarged. To me it looks really crappy in the infobox. I don't think that people get confused about it.

About details, like a smaller gap between loco and tracks or anything else, it is no prob to fix it.

This is how my brain works! ;-)

I will give the example above more different sizes to make it more clear, what I mean.