Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-15636815-20141126001742/@comment-5275054-20141126163039

Looks cleaner than what is there now and more consise on the presentation of the information. Overall an improvement. A few random thoughts:

- I like the increased detail in the calcualtion and what they mean to the user. Once someone understands them they will likely bypass them to reference the charts so should that section appear at the end? The counter is if it is at the end, people might never see it altogether. Not sure which way would be best.

- Can we get the table to look more like the rest of the tables? (No boarders and shading to divide columns and rows) Given that this table is more intricate than most not sure if that will work but worth a try.

- The per minute calculations was good in that it showed for material generation, the shorter destinations are more efficient relative to time. That element is lost in the current table. We should find some way to compare the sites on that metric. We would not need to go more than 4 decimal places if we used the same calculation. Or if we can come up with a different calculation that allows for that comparison. Another thought would be to split it into two tables (makes for a long page but keeps the tables from getting too crowded with numbers). Maybe one for resources, the other for pass, mail and XP?

Thoughts. . ..