Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-15636815-20150222200238

A few months ago, I mentioned that I was working on redesigning the Local Trains page to make it easier to use. This weekend, I worked hard on this page, and it's almost complete.

I'm looking for feedback on what I've done so far.
 * Greatly simplified the trip yields table. Replaced "per minute" numbers with "per trip" numbers. The previous numbers used too many decimal places to be practical, and rounding produced less accurate results. The new numbers eliminate a step from each calculation, and the results are more accurate.
 * Provided examples for calculating income. The examples on the page are complete, though I still need to create a few more examples.
 * Are the examples clear enough?
 * Are the examples simple enough to follow?
 * Are the examples too simple?
 * Are the examples too long?
 * Are there too many examples? too few?
 * Redesigned the destinations table after we discovered that different train types use different destination names.
 * An unbiased tester commented that the names on the destination images were confusing. Each image has two names, but seeing one name on the image and a different name to the side made him say, "Huh?"
 * I edited the images for the 6-minute destinations, removing the names. The tester liked the change, saying that he now understands the information as it is intended.
 * Assuming the community also likes the change, what should we name the "nameless" images? I used the format "Destination 6minPMX" and "Destination 6minF", to show trip length and cargo (Passengers, Mail, XP, Freight). Is that good, or would something else be better?
 * Upon request, I included the "per minute" numbers from the current page in a table all the way at the bottom, for the purpose of showing the relationship between trip length and trip profitability. How did I do?

...or any or other feedback you want to offer. The more, the better! :-D 