Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-80.187.103.142-20150309120420/@comment-15636815-20150311132106

See? This is why I love newbies! :-D

Instead of looking at the tables with the mindset that they should contain that information because they always have, you brought the perspective we needed. The redesign you describe is exactly in line with the admins' desire to move unnecessary info out of the tables and onto the article pages. In this case, there's actually nothing to move, since the info in question is already on the article pages. All we really need is to remove from the tables the crap doesn't need to be in tables.

We still should wait until the SG is done before making wholesale changes. If you wanted to create a sample page, though, and post your redesign ideas there, I would encourage that. ;-)

Speaking of the SG, I fixed the link in my post above. As for your idea about the set infobox, let's talk more about that later. It's an interesting idea.

P.S. Some people like to know the tax-to-power ratios of trains. It creates an apples-to-apples cost-benefit analysis (which is the same reason to have passenger-to-space ratios of buildings). That info doesn't appear anywhere on the site except in those train tables, so it's probably a good idea to keep it there, if we can make it fit.