Board Thread:TrainStation Wiki News/@comment-26090008-20150302222337/@comment-26090008-20150320114541

You're right; what was I thinking? Of course there are plenty of sets that require gems to complete. I was just thinking of the famous promise that game objectives (contracts, achievements) will not require gems to complete. However, this made me guilty over wayyyy overgeneralizing. OK, so no change to the Sets page.

Next question: Do we put the footnote next to every set-related objective, or just the ones where there is some confusion? (The ones that have a option). Going back to the Johann example, I put the footnote on Tasks 5 and 31. This is where the previous version of this note was located originally, because these are the sets that have gems options. However there is no footnote on task 30 (relating to set: Heavy Constructor) Since this has no gems option. On the one hand, we don't want to just spam the whole page with footnotes, since our objective is cleaning things up, but on the other hand, if we just place the footnote on some of the set-related tasks, we need to go through and verify which tasks need the note and which don't, creating a bit of work.

Finally,
 * 2%
 * 1%
 * 0%